MIKA VS GURU / READER INFORMATION
How We Research Our Guides
An interesting claim is a starting point. A useful guide shows what supports it, where the evidence stops and what the reader can actually check.
Evidence beside the claim
We prioritise original papers, regulator guidance and official product documentation for factual claims. Links sit near the relevant passage, with a source list for further reading. A company’s description establishes what it says about a product; it does not independently prove the product works. When access is limited to an abstract, we identify that limit.
Practical value, not a longer summary
Our guides add a worked example, a comparison, a decision record or a method readers can try. Examples invented for teaching are labelled. Their arithmetic is separate from evidence about what happens in practice. We do not present hypothetical income, returns, research findings or customer experiences as observed results.
Research is not a product recommendation
A result in a dish, an animal or a small human study does not automatically establish a treatment or consumer benefit. A technology demonstration does not establish an investable business. We aim to preserve those distinctions and explain what additional evidence the next claim would require.
Who is speaking
Mika and Guru are fictional, AI-created characters. Articles carry the Mika vs Guru publishing byline; it is not a claim of medical, financial or other professional accreditation. AI tools assist research, drafting and production. The use of AI is not evidence that a claim is correct, and the presence of sources does not guarantee that we have interpreted them correctly.
Dates, scope and corrections
Article dates identify publication or substantive revision. We do not promise that every page reflects every subsequent study, rule or product update. A focused companion article is not a systematic review unless it explicitly describes a systematic method.
To flag a potential error, send the page URL, exact passage and a source through a public channel linked below, addressed to Mika vs Guru management. Keep personal and confidential information out of comments. We can correct a factual error without changing the article’s central conclusion, or revise the conclusion when the evidence requires it.
Commercial influence
Sponsorship and affiliate relationships should be disclosed beside the relevant content. A commercial relationship is not scientific evidence or a suitability assessment. Read the Educational Disclaimer and Terms & Conditions before relying on a resource.